In a transfer that has sparked vital controversy throughout the hashish trade and amongst reform advocates, Republican Senators James Lankford (Oklahoma) and Pete Ricketts (Nebraska) have launched a invoice that seeks to completely implement the tax penalties imposed on hashish companies beneath Part 280E of the Inner Income Code. The laws, titled the “No Deductions for Marijuana Companies Act,” was filed on February 7, 2025, and goals to make sure that marijuana operators stay unable to deduct normal enterprise bills, even when marijuana is rescheduled beneath federal legislation.
The proposal comes at a time when hashish reform advocates have been pushing for fairer tax insurance policies and better federal recognition of the authorized hashish trade. Nevertheless, this invoice represents a big impediment to these efforts, as it could successfully preserve one of the crucial burdensome monetary restrictions on hashish companies indefinitely. This text explores the implications of the proposed laws, its potential affect on the hashish trade, and the broader context of federal marijuana coverage reform.
What Is Part 280E?
Part 280E of the Inner Income Code is a decades-old provision that has lengthy been a thorn within the facet of authorized hashish operators. Enacted in 1982 throughout the peak of the Struggle on Medication, Part 280E prevents companies concerned in trafficking Schedule I or II managed substances from deducting odd and obligatory enterprise bills from their taxable earnings. This contains bills comparable to lease, payroll, utilities, promoting, and different operational prices.
The availability was initially designed to focus on unlawful drug sellers however has since been utilized to state-legal hashish companies because of marijuana’s classification as a Schedule I drug beneath the Managed Substances Act (CSA). Because of this, hashish operators are topic to considerably greater efficient tax charges in comparison with companies in different industries. In some instances, these tax charges can attain as excessive as 70% to 90%, leaving many hashish corporations struggling to remain afloat regardless of producing substantial income.
For years, hashish advocates have argued that Part 280E is outdated and unfairly penalizes companies that function legally beneath state legal guidelines. They contend that eradicating or modifying this provision would permit hashish corporations to reinvest of their operations, create jobs, and contribute extra successfully to native economies.
The “No Deductions for Marijuana Companies Act”
The invoice launched by Senators Lankford and Ricketts seeks to cement Part 280E’s utility to hashish companies completely. Particularly, it could be sure that even when marijuana is rescheduled from its present classification as a Schedule I drug—one thing reform advocates have been pushing for—hashish operators would nonetheless be barred from deducting normal enterprise bills.
In a press release accompanying the invoice’s introduction, Senator Lankford mentioned:
”Marijuana doesn’t make our households stronger, our streets safer, or our workplaces extra productive. Companies that promote federally unlawful medicine—together with marijuana companies—shouldn’t get federal tax breaks.”
Senator Ricketts echoed this sentiment, emphasizing his opposition to what he described as efforts to “normalize” marijuana use:
”We can’t permit federal tax coverage to subsidize an trade that poses critical dangers to public well being and security.”
The invoice displays a broader ideological stance amongst sure Republican lawmakers who stay staunchly against hashish legalization at each the state and federal ranges. By concentrating on one of many key monetary incentives for rescheduling or descheduling marijuana—specifically, aid from Part 280E’s tax penalties—the laws seeks to undermine efforts to legitimize the trade.
Implications for Hashish Companies
If enacted, the “No Deductions for Marijuana Companies Act” would deal a big blow to hashish operators already grappling with excessive taxes and regulatory challenges. Many within the trade had been hopeful that rescheduling marijuana—comparable to transferring it from Schedule I to Schedule III beneath the CSA—would alleviate a few of these burdens by rendering Part 280E inapplicable. Nevertheless, this invoice would be sure that these hopes are dashed.
Monetary Pressure on Operators
The lack to deduct odd enterprise bills implies that hashish corporations are taxed on their gross earnings quite than their internet earnings. This creates an unsustainable monetary mannequin for a lot of operators, notably small and medium-sized companies that lack entry to conventional banking companies or capital because of federal prohibition.
For instance:
A dispensary with $1 million in income may incur $800,000 in working bills. Beneath regular tax guidelines, it could pay taxes on $200,000 in revenue. Nevertheless, due to Part 280E, it should pay taxes on the total $1 million in income. With efficient tax charges usually exceeding 70%, this leaves little room for reinvestment or progress—and in some instances results in insolvency.
By conserving these restrictions completely intact, Lankford and Ricketts’ invoice may exacerbate present disparities throughout the trade. Bigger multi-state operators (MSOs) with vital sources might be able to climate these challenges higher than smaller unbiased companies or social fairness candidates looking for entry into the market.
Influence on State-Authorized Markets
The monetary pressure imposed by Part 280E additionally has broader implications for state-legal hashish markets. Excessive taxes and working prices make it troublesome for authorized companies to compete with illicit operators who don’t face comparable monetary constraints. This undermines one of many main targets of legalization: lowering the scale of the unlawful market.
In line with Beau Whitney, Chief Economist at Whitney Economics:
”Sustaining 280E restrictions will solely perpetuate an uneven taking part in discipline the place illicit operators thrive whereas authorized companies battle.”
States that depend on tax income from authorized hashish gross sales may additionally really feel the affect. If authorized operators are pressured out of enterprise because of unsustainable tax insurance policies, states may see declines in income earmarked for training, healthcare, infrastructure tasks, and different public companies funded by hashish taxes.
Opposition From Advocates and Business Leaders
The introduction of this invoice has drawn sharp criticism from hashish advocates and trade leaders who view it as a regressive step that ignores each financial realities and shifting public opinion on marijuana legalization.
Advocacy Teams Converse Out
Organizations such because the Nationwide Hashish Business Affiliation (NCIA) and Marijuana Coverage Mission (MPP) have condemned Lankford and Ricketts’ proposal. In a press release launched shortly after the invoice’s introduction, NCIA Government Director Aaron Smith mentioned:
”This laws represents an outdated method rooted in stigma quite than science or widespread sense. It unfairly targets an trade that Is creating jobs, producing tax income, and offering protected entry for hundreds of thousands of People.”
Equally, MPP’s Deputy Director Matthew Schweich argued:
”Punitive tax insurance policies like 280E solely serve to bolster the illicit market whereas undermining reputable companies making an attempt to function inside state legal guidelines.”
Business Leaders React
Hashish enterprise homeowners have additionally voiced their considerations about how this laws may affect their operations. Many argue that truthful tax remedy is important not just for their survival but additionally for fostering innovation and competitors throughout the trade.
Kim Rivers, CEO of Trulieve Hashish Corp., acknowledged: ”The authorized hashish trade has confirmed its worth again and again by way of job creation and group funding. Insurance policies like this threaten all of that progress.”
Broader Context: Federal Rescheduling Efforts
The timing of this invoice is especially notable given ongoing discussions about rescheduling marijuana on the federal degree. In late 2023, President Joe Biden directed federal companies—together with the Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS) and Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)—to overview marijuana’s classification beneath the CSA. HHS subsequently really useful transferring marijuana from Schedule I (probably the most restrictive class) to Schedule III.
Rescheduling marijuana would signify a big shift in federal coverage by acknowledging its medical worth whereas lowering some regulatory obstacles. Nevertheless, it could not legalize marijuana outright or deal with points like banking entry or interstate commerce.
Advocates had hoped that rescheduling would additionally get rid of Part 280E’s utility to hashish companies—a key incentive for reform efforts. By introducing laws particularly designed to protect these tax penalties no matter rescheduling outcomes, Lankford and Ricketts are successfully preempting one of many potential advantages of reform.
Conclusion
The “No Deductions for Marijuana Companies Act” launched by Senators James Lankford and Pete Ricketts represents a big problem for advocates looking for fairer remedy for authorized hashish operators beneath federal legislation. By aiming to maintain Part 280E’s tax penalties completely intact—even when marijuana is rescheduled—the invoice threatens to undermine progress towards legitimizing an trade that has already confronted quite a few obstacles. Whereas proponents argue that such measures are obligatory to forestall “subsidizing” an trade they oppose on ethical grounds, critics contend that sustaining punitive tax insurance policies will solely hurt reputable companies whereas empowering illicit markets.
As debates over federal marijuana coverage proceed—together with discussions round rescheduling—it stays essential for stakeholders throughout the hashish trade to mobilize towards regressive measures like this one. The way forward for America’s quickly evolving relationship with hashish hangs within the stability—and selections made now will form its trajectory for years to come back.
MORE ON 280E, IT KILLS CANNABIS, READ ON…
