The eleventh U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals on Wednesday dominated in favor of a bunch of Florida medical hashish sufferers who alleged that stopping them from proudly owning weapons as a result of their doctor-prescribed medical practices is unconstitutional, Reuters studies.

Federal legislation prevents anybody who consumes a federally managed substance — like hashish, which stays Schedule I beneath federal legislation — from legally possessing firearms. The lawsuit, nevertheless, hinges on a 2022 Supreme Courtroom resolution requiring gun restrictions to be “in keeping with this nation’s historic custom of firearm regulation.”

Initially accompanied by then-Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried (D), the plaintiffs filed their lawsuit in 2022, arguing that the federal coverage violates the Second Modification rights of state-approved medical hashish sufferers. The lawsuit additionally claimed the coverage violates a congressional funds provision to stop federal interference with state-level hashish applications.

“As we have now argued from the start of this case, the 2nd Modification doesn’t allow the federal authorities to categorically deem all medical marijuana sufferers to be too harmful to train their core constitutional rights.” — William Corridor, legal professional for the plaintiffs at Jones Walker, in a press release

It’s the second main victory for hashish affected person gun house owners this yr after the fifth U.S. Circuit Courtroom of Appeals in January reaffirmed that the federal prosecution of a Mississippi man who was caught possessing a firearm whereas having additionally consumed hashish had violated the Second Modification.