
What Messages Are We Sending to the Youngsters? A Laborious Take a look at Authorities Hypocrisy
A bunch of lawmakers lately despatched Trump a letter urging him to not reschedule hashish as a result of it could ship “the improper message to the youngsters.” You realize what? I truly agree that hashish should not be rescheduled—however not for his or her causes. Hashish needs to be utterly descheduled, faraway from the Managed Substances Act totally, as a result of it isn’t a “substance” within the pharmaceutical sense. It is a plant. And in a rustic that allegedly values particular person freedom and bodily autonomy, free individuals ought to resolve what they put in their very own our bodies.
However let’s set that apart for a second and actually study this “improper message to the youngsters” argument. As a result of if we’re genuinely involved about what messages we’re sending to the subsequent era, we have to take a tough, sincere take a look at what the U.S. authorities is definitely instructing kids by means of its actions. And spoiler alert: the teachings are completely fucking terrifying.
Lesson One: Violence Is Acceptable When We Do It
Let’s begin with essentially the most obtrusive hypocrisy: the federal government’s selective ethical outrage about hurt to kids.
These lawmakers are clutching their pearls about hashish “sending the improper message,” whereas the U.S. authorities actively sends billions of {dollars} in bombs to Israel which can be being dropped on Gaza, killing hundreds of Palestinian kids. As of current counts, over 14,000 kids have been killed in Gaza since October 2023. Youngsters. Precise youngsters, not theoretical future hashish customers.
However apparently, that is okay. That sends the suitable message. As a result of these kids—in accordance with the prevailing narrative—pose a “risk” to Israeli safety. By no means thoughts that they are kids residing in an open-air jail, with no management over Hamas, no say of their authorities, and no skill to defend themselves towards some of the superior militaries on the earth.
What message does this ship? Easy: violence is appropriate when the federal government deems it needed. Your life’s worth relies upon totally on the place you have been born and who holds energy.
In the meantime, the U.S. army is bombing random ships within the Caribbean—20 boats and counting—that account for lower than 1% of all medicine getting into the USA. There is not any authorized oversight, no due course of, simply bombing with a “belief me bro” angle. The overwhelming majority of medication come by means of authorized ports of entry, however truly addressing that will require systemic options as an alternative of theatrical shows of drive.
What are we instructing youngsters? That violence is the reply, which may makes proper, and that the rule of regulation solely applies when it is handy.
Lesson Two: Free Speech Has Limits (That We Outline)
Wish to train your First Modification rights? Higher be sure to’re criticizing the suitable individuals.
Disagree with U.S. overseas coverage, notably relating to Israel? You are an antisemite. Criticize authorities overreach? Relying on who’s in energy, you are both a “Nazi” or a “lefty lunatic” or a “right-wing extremist.” The labels change, however the message stays the identical: shut up and comply, or we’ll smear you into silence.
We’re instructing youngsters that free speech is simply free while you’re saying what the highly effective wish to hear. Step out of line, and you will be labeled, ostracized, and doubtlessly criminalized. Some message about freedom, huh?
Lesson Three: Medicine Are Dangerous (Until Pfizer Makes Them)
Here is my private favourite piece of hypocrisy: “Medicine are unhealthy! Until a man in a white coat says they are not—then they are not simply good, they’re so good that we have to defend the businesses making them.”
Let’s discuss concerning the reliable pharmaceutical trade that these lawmakers are so keen to guard:
Purdue Pharma: Knowingly lied concerning the addictive potential of OxyContin, fueling an opioid epidemic that has killed over 500,000 People. The Sackler household walked away billions richer whereas communities have been destroyed. Settlement: $6 billion. No one went to jail.
Johnson & Johnson: Offered talcum child powder containing asbestos for many years, inflicting ovarian most cancers and mesothelioma in hundreds of ladies and their kids. They knew. Inside paperwork show they knew. Settlement: $8.9 billion. No one went to jail.
Pfizer: Between 1991 and 2017, paid $4.7 billion in fines for all the pieces from unlawful advertising of medication to defrauding Medicare/Medicaid applications. They actually paid docs to prescribe their medicine, lied about efficacy, and suppressed unfavorable analysis findings. No one went to jail.
However certain, hashish is the harmful drug we have to steer clear of youngsters. Not the capsules that pharmaceutical corporations aggressively market, not the opioids they lied about, not the contaminated merchandise they knowingly bought. These are effective. These are medication. These come from “trusted” sources.
What message does this ship? That revenue trumps security, that companies are above the regulation, and that it’s best to belief authority figures even once they’re demonstrably mendacity to you. Oh, and nature—with its thousands and thousands of years of evolutionary knowledge—is harmful, however artificial compounds created by corporations with in depth prison information are secure.
Neglect the endocannabinoid system that exists in each human physique. Neglect the hundreds of years of medicinal hashish use. Belief the capsule. Belief the company. Do not belief your individual physique’s pure biology.
Lesson 4: Conflict Is the American Approach of Life
Bear in mind Trump’s marketing campaign promise of being the “no new wars president”? How’s that understanding?
We have army motion ramping up globally, proposals to invade Mexico to “struggle the cartels,” threats to drone strike sovereign nations, and a full-steam imperial American motion that makes it clear: conflict is simply what People do. Loss of life and fireplace to the world, wrapped in a flag and known as patriotism.
For a rustic that loves to speak about “defending kids,” we certain appear comfy creating thousands and thousands of orphans across the globe. However at the very least we’re defending them from the horror of… seeing adults use hashish legally?
The message to youngsters: Violence solves issues. Navy would possibly equals righteousness. And American exceptionalism means we get to bomb whoever we would like, every time we would like, for no matter purpose we deem justified.
Lesson 5: Do not Belief Your Personal Eyes
The Epstein case is the latest and obtrusive instance of this lesson in authorities gaslighting.
Everyone knows Epstein trafficked kids to rich, highly effective individuals. Trump himself stated he’d launch the Epstein information throughout his marketing campaign. However when he grew to become president, they “launched” paperwork that have been already publicly obtainable, made a giant spectacle about transparency, after which quietly let the difficulty die.
Now the road is: there’s nothing there. And when you preserve asking about it: “Why are you continue to speaking about this?” The names on these flight logs? The detailed information of who visited that island? The corroborating testimony from victims? None of it issues as a result of the federal government says it would not.
What message does this ship? Do not belief what you see with your individual eyes. Do not belief your logical conclusions. Belief what the highly effective let you know to imagine, even when it contradicts observable actuality.
If Joe Biden’s America was “Courageous New World”—comfy numbness by means of pharmaceutical compliance—Trump’s America is “1984,” full with Zionists controlling essentially the most highly effective army on the earth as a result of their president “positively wasn’t” within the Epstein information and “by no means had a relationship” with Epstein. In truth, who was Epstein? Why are you continue to speaking about it? Transfer on. There are hashish customers to prosecute.
Lesson Six: Veterans Are Props, Not Folks
Lastly, let’s speak about what we educate youngsters about service and sacrifice.
When you serve within the army, the very best you may get is a politician doing a passing remark about your “service” whereas they fake to struggle for you. However as soon as your usefulness runs out? When you’re coping with PTSD, traumatic mind accidents, persistent ache from fight wounds, or simply attempting to reintegrate into civilian life?
You are by yourself.
Veterans kill themselves at alarming charges—a median of 17 per day. Many flip to hashish for aid from PTSD, ache, and insomnia as a result of the prescribed drugs the VA prescribes both do not work or create worse issues. However hashish stays federally unlawful, doubtlessly costing veterans their advantages in the event that they’re caught utilizing it.
The message: Your sacrifice means nothing as soon as we’re carried out utilizing you. We’ll ship you to kill and die for company pursuits and geopolitical video games, and while you come again damaged, we’ll let you know that the one medication that really helps is unlawful and immoral.
The Analysis They’re Ignoring
If lawmakers have been genuinely involved about hurt discount and sending the suitable message to youngsters, they’d take a look at the precise science.
Professor David Nutt’s groundbreaking analysis on drug harms—printed in The Lancet, one of many world’s most prestigious medical journals—clearly demonstrates that alcohol is much extra harmful than hashish, psilocybin, LSD, and MDMA. His analysis ranks medicine primarily based on hurt to customers and hurt to others, utilizing rigorous scientific methodology.
The outcomes? Alcohol is essentially the most dangerous drug total. Hashish would not even crack the highest ten. But alcohol is authorized, socially acceptable, and aggressively marketed, whereas hashish stays federally prohibited.
What message does this ship? That our drug insurance policies aren’t primarily based on precise hurt discount or public well being—they’re primarily based on politics, company pursuits, and cultural prejudice.
The Actual Message to Youngsters
So let’s be clear about what messages we’re truly sending to the subsequent era:
Violence is appropriate when the highly effective do it. Free speech solely counts while you agree with the federal government. Belief companies which have confirmed observe information of mendacity and killing individuals for revenue. Conflict is regular and good. Do not imagine your individual eyes or logical reasoning. When you serve your nation, you are disposable when you’re not helpful.
However hashish? Hashish is the place we draw the road. That is the “improper message.”
The Sticky Backside Line
If these lawmakers have been genuinely involved about sending the suitable message to youngsters, they’d begin by addressing the completely poisonous, hypocritical, and dangerous messages their very own insurance policies are broadcasting loud and clear.
Hashish is not innocent. No drug is. However in comparison with alcohol—which is authorized, marketed, and culturally celebrated—hashish is miles safer by each goal measure. And that is all we have ever argued: if society can settle for alcohol as a nationwide drug regardless of its huge harms, then by any logical normal, we needs to be equally accepting of hashish, psilocybin, LSD, MDMA, and quite a few different substances with decrease hazard profiles.
The “improper message to youngsters” argument is a smokescreen. It is a handy excuse to take care of prohibition whereas ignoring way more dangerous authorities actions and insurance policies. It is simpler to demonize a plant than to handle the systemic violence, corruption, and hypocrisy that outline American governance.
So this is a message for these lawmakers involved about what we’re instructing kids: Youngsters aren’t silly. They will see the contradictions. They will acknowledge hypocrisy. And the extra you misinform them about hashish whereas bombing kids abroad, defending pharmaceutical criminals, and gaslighting them about Epstein, the much less they will belief something you say.
Perhaps the true “improper message” is instructing youngsters that the federal government provides a rattling about their wellbeing within the first place.




